Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
ObjectiveTo assess the therapeutic effect of tDCS on cognitive function in patients with Parkinson's disease.MethodsFrom the start of the library's construction until June 24, 2024, we searched the following databases for literature: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP), and China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM). We also looked through the references in the articles. The improvement of overall cognition in patients with Parkinson's disease with tDCS was the primary outcome indicator. The improvement of executive function, memory, attention, language, quality of life, and depression with tDCS were the secondary outcome indicators. Two researchers extracted data independently, with a third researcher mediating in the event of a dispute. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to evaluate the quality of the included literature.ResultsA total of 23 articles encompassing 874 subjects were included. tDCS has shown significant efficacy on overall cognition (SMD = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.57 to 0.89, I2 = 0%, P 2 = 0%, P = 0.01) and language function (SMD = 0.5, 95% CI = 0.2 to 0.8, I2 = 0%, P = 0.001). Furthermore, the clinical efficacy of tDCS was enhanced with a stimulation intensity of 2 mA (SMD = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.58 to 0.93, I2 = 7%, P 2 = 6%, P 2 = 0%, P 2 = 0%, P = 0.006).ConclusiontDCS demonstrated substantial efficacy in enhancing overall cognition in patients with PD. The efficacy of tDCS was obvious in executive function, language, and depressive mood. Nonetheless, a substantial quantity of rigorous clinical trials on tDCS for cognitive function in patients with PD remains necessary in the future.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.