SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

A simple and effective screening strategy for early multiple system atrophy diagnosis and α-Synuclein forms in erythrocytes.

Front Aging Neurosci · 2025-02-21

DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2025.1533504PMID: 40061041

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundUrinary dysfunction is an early manifestation of autonomic dysfunction in Multiple System Atrophy (MSA) and often precedes orthostatic hypotension. This study investigated the diagnostic efficacy of post-void residual (PVR) urine volume in differentiating possible MSA from early-stage Parkinson's disease (PD) and sought to identify a feasible combination of autonomic nervous system indicators for clinical use. The distribution of α-Synuclein (α-Syn) forms in erythrocyte was preliminary explored.MethodsThis study included 70 patients with MSA-P, 73 with MSA-C, and 71 with PD. All participants underwent assessments including bladder residual urine ultrasound, the supine-to-standing test (STS), external anal sphincter electromyography (EAS-EMG), brain MRI, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves determined the diagnostic value of PVR urine volume and other autonomic indicators for possible MSA. Immunofluorescence staining of α-Syn forms in red blood cells (RBCs) was also performed.ResultsPVR urine volume, ΔSBP and ΔDBP (at 1 and 3 min), and EAS-EMG parameters were significantly increased in MSA-P and MSA-C patients compared to PD (p ConclusionCombining PVR urine volume and ΔSBP (at 1 and 3 min) is an easily accessible and effective method for distinguishing possible MSA from early-stage PD. This combination should be considered for routine assessment in Parkinsonism. Distinct α-Syn forms distribution in erythrocytes could be considered as a useful biomarker for differential diagnosis.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.