SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Voice analysis in Parkinson's disease - a systematic literature review.

Artif Intell Med · 2025-03-17

DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2025.103109PMID: 40132400

Check source for accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Systematic Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Background and aimParkinson's disease is a neurodegenerative disease. It is often diagnosed at an advanced stage, which can influence the control over the illness. Therefore, the possibility of diagnosing Parkinson's disease at an earlier stage, and possibly prognosticate it, could be an advantage. Given this, a literature review that covers current studies in the field is relevant.MethodsThe aim of this study is to present a systematic literature review in which the models used for the diagnosis and prognosis of Parkinson's disease through voice and speech assessment are elucidated. Three databases were consulted to obtain the studies between 2019 and 2023: SienceDirect, IEEE Xplore and ACM Library .ResultsOne hundred and six studies were considered eligible, considering the definition of inclusion and exclusion criteria. The vast majority of these studies (94.34%) focus on diagnosing the disease, while the remainder (11.32%) focus on prognosis.ConclusionVoice analysis for the diagnosis and prognosis of Parkinson's disease using machine learning techniques can be achieved, with very satisfactory performance results, like is demonstrated in this systematic literature review.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.