SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Using Single-Cell RNA sequencing with Drosophila, Zebrafish, and mouse models for studying Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease.

Neuroscience · 2025-03-26

DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2025.03.042PMID: 40154937

Check source for accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease are the most common neurodegenerative diseases, significantly affecting the elderly with no current cure available. With the rapidly aging global population, advancing research on these diseases becomes increasingly critical. Both disorders are often studied using model organisms, which enable researchers to investigate disease phenotypes and their underlying molecular mechanisms. In this review, we critically discuss the strengths and limitations of using Drosophila, zebrafish, and mice as models for Alzheimer's and Parkinson's research. A focus is the application of single-cell RNA sequencing, which has revolutionized the field by providing novel insights into the cellular and transcriptomic landscapes characterizing these diseases. We assess how combining animal disease modeling with high-throughput sequencing and computational approaches has advanced the field of Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease research. Thereby, we highlight the importance of integrative multidisciplinary approaches to further our understanding of disease mechanisms and thus accelerating the development of successful therapeutic interventions.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.