SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Efficacy of virtual reality-based cognitive behavioral group therapy in enhancing emotional well-being and quality of life in Parkinson's disease: A randomized controlled trial.

Clin Park Relat Disord · 2025-03-11

DOI: 10.1016/j.prdoa.2025.100316PMID: 40161512

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

ObjectiveThis study evaluates the effectiveness of virtual reality-based cognitive behavioral group therapy (VR-CBGT) in improving emotional well-being and quality of life in individuals with Parkinson's disease.MethodsA randomized controlled trial was conducted in 2023 at Roozbeh Hospital, Tehran, with 90 Parkinson's patients. Participants were randomly assigned to an intervention group receiving 12 VR-CBGT sessions over three months with a control group receiving standard medical care without psychological intervention. Emotional well-being was assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and quality of life was measured with the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39) before and after the intervention. Data were analyzed using Multivariate Analysis of Covariance (MANCOVA) in SPSS-25.ResultsThe intervention group demonstrated a significant improvement in emotional well-being (HADS-total score reduction of 7.2 points, P ConclusionThese findings highlight VR-CBGT as an effective complementary intervention for enhancing psychological health and overall quality of life in Parkinson's patients. The immersive nature of VR fosters engagement and facilitates cognitive and emotional processing, supporting its integration into multidisciplinary treatment approaches.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.