SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Anosmia and Upper Limb Rigidity-A Potential Phenotype of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus with Cerebrospinal Fluid α-Synuclein Seeds.

Mov Disord · 2025-04-09

DOI: 10.1002/mds.30184PMID: 40200913

Open accessbrief-report; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundThe pathophysiology of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) and its association with neurodegenerative disorders is poorly understood.ObjectivesThe aim was to determine the prevalence of α-synuclein pathology in iNPH and its associations with clinical characteristics.MethodsWe used α-synuclein seed amplification assay (synSAA) to retrospectively analyze cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from a large single-center iNPH cohort (n = 144). Clinical assessments comprised Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III, Mini-Mental State Examination, levodopa-challenge test, and olfactory identification test. Degenerative biomarkers (total-tau, phospho-tau, β-amyloid 1-42, and β-amyloid 1-40) were measured in CSF.ResultsA total of 30.1% of iNPH patients were synSAA+, and presented significantly more upper limb (UL) rigidity, hallucinations, and worse olfactory performance than synSAA- cases. Anosmia was higher in synSAA+ patients (64.0%) than synSAA- patients (15.3%). Clinical assessments and other biomarkers did not significantly vary with synSAA status.ConclusionsUnderlying α-synuclein pathology is common in iNPH and presents with UL rigidity and olfactory dysfunction, suggesting a distinct synSAA+ phenotype in iNPH. © 2025 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.