NeuralCipher Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
BackgroundDespite the high prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD)-ranging from 27 % to 85 % including symptoms such as urinary urgency,- incontinence, frequency, and nocturia-evidence-based treatment options remain limited. Conservative treatments, such as bladder training, pelvic floor muscle exercises (PFME) with biofeedback and electrical stimulation, have been shown safe and effective in the general population, with minimal side effects. However, their efficacy specifically in PD patients remains unclear. Therefore this study aims to evaluate the effect of electrical stimulation with conservative treatment for LUTS in PD patients.Methods and analysisThis randomized controlled trial includes three study arms. All three groups will receive conservative treatment in combination with different electrical stimulation parameters, small- and broad pulse duration and sham electrical stimulation. In total 150 PD patients with self-reported LUTS who are able to attend a pelvic physical therapy practice independently and complete online questionnaires will be enrolled. The primary outcome is the difference in international prostate symptom score (IPSS), with a range of 0-35.A minimal important difference of 4.2 between baseline and 12 weeks of treatment will be statistical significant (p˂0.05). Secondary outcome include questionnaires evaluating bladder dysfunction, burden, and quality of life and will be collected at baseline, 12 weeks and 24 weeks and at one year. Additionally pelvic floor muscle function will be assed at baseline and after 12 weeks.All participants receive eight sessions along with their assigned electrical stimulation treatment and conservative treatment.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.