Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
Synaptic dysfunction is a common feature across a broad spectrum of brain diseases, spanning from psychopathologies such as posttraumatic stress disorder and substance use disorders to neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease. While neuroscience research aiming to understand the mechanisms underlying synaptic dysfunction has traditionally focused on the neuronal elements of the synapse, recent research increasingly acknowledges the contribution of astrocytes as a third element controlling synaptic transmission. This also sparked interest to investigate the tripartite synapse and its role in the etiology of neurological diseases. According to recent evidence, changes in the structural interaction between astrocytes and synapses not only play a pivotal role in modulating synaptic function and behavioral states, but also are implicated in the initiation and progression of various brain diseases. This review aims to integrate recent findings that provide insight into the molecular mechanisms underpinning astrocytic structural changes at the synapse. We present a comprehensive discussion of the potential implications of compromised astrocyte-synapse interactions and suggest that astrocytic synaptic coverage is generally reduced in numerous neurological disorders, with the extent of it being disease and stage specific. Finally, we propose outstanding questions on astrocyte-synapse structural plasticity that are relevant for future therapeutic strategies to address neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric diseases.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.