NeuralCipher Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
ObjectivePathophysiological backgrounds of idiopathic Parkinson's disease (IPD) and autosomal recessive monogenic Parkinson's disease (AR-PD) have common features that can be assessed through multimodal imaging. In this study, the striatal and myocardial dopaminergic innervation, brain 18F-FDG metabolism, resting-state functional activity of basal ganglia network (BGN) and white-matter (WM) microstructure were evaluated in AR-PD with respect to IPD, to investigate whether AR-PD can be subtyped as "brain-first" parkinsonism according to recent etiopathogenetic classification effort.MethodsForty patients (17 with Parkin, 3 with DJ-1 mutations and 20 with IPD) were included. Striatal dopaminergic innervation was assessed semi-quantitatively by 18F-DOPA PET, and cardiac 18F-DOPA uptake was also evaluated. Brain 18F-FDG PET images were evaluated visually. Resting-state functional MRI and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) were used to assess the BGN activity and WM microstructural alterations.ResultsAR-PD patients showed significantly decreased 18F-DOPA uptake in caudate corpus compared to both IPD and controls, with a more symmetrical striatal dopaminergic denervation. Myocardial 18F-DOPA uptake in AR-PD was similar to controls, while it was significantly reduced in IPD. There was no significant difference in cortical 18F-FDG metabolism and functional activity of BGN between PD groups. The DTI data revealed more extensive WM microstructural damage in AR-PD compared to IPD.ConclusionsAR-PD group showed additional significant decreased 18F-DOPA uptake in caudate corpus and more symmetrical striatal denervation. Additionally, relatively preserved myocardial innervation, cortical metabolic and WM microstructural changes suggest the possibility of "brain-first" type progression in AR-PD. Also, 18F-DOPA PET/CT may be a practical tool for evaluating dopaminergic innervation of striatum and heart together, but further evaluation is needed in this area.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.