SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Investigation of the Impact of Deep Brain Stimulation of the Subthalamic Nucleus on Parkinson Disease Patients with Genetic Risk Factors/Causes.

World Neurosurg · 2025-04-26

DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2025.124021PMID: 40294793

Check source for accessJournal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

ObjectiveThe impact of deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBS) on patients with Parkinson disease (PD) with different genetic risk factors/causes remains uncertain. This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of STN-DBS in these patients.MethodsThis study compared STN-DBS outcomes in 18 PD patients with mutations in glucosylceramidase beta (GBA) (n = 3), leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) (n = 9), or Parkin RBR E3 ubiquitin ligase/PTEN-induced kinase 1/DJ1 (n = 6). Clinical measures-levodopa equivalent daily dose, Movement Disorder Society Unified-Parkinson Disease Rating Scale Part III, Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39), and total electrical energy delivered-were assessed at baseline, programming initiation, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postsurgery. Linear mixed models analyzed longitudinal and intergroup differences.ResultsAll groups showed significant time-dependent improvements. Levodopa equivalent daily dose dropped sharply post-DBS (maximal reduction at 1 year: β = -577.33, P ConclusionsSTN-DBS demonstrated benefits for patients with PD across all genetic backgrounds, but LRRK2 carriers may require increasing stimulation over time, while GBA carriers show reduced motor and quality-of-life improvements.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.