SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Correlation Analysis Between 3D and Plane DAT Binding Parameters of <sup>11</sup>C-CFT PET/CT and the Clinical Characteristics of Patients with Parkinson's Disease.

J Integr Neurosci · 2025-04-01

DOI: 10.31083/jin24440PMID: 40302258

Check source for accessJournal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between dopamine transporter (DAT) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) and the clinical characteristics and rating scales of Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. Additionally, we sought to assess the scientific validity and feasibility of integrating 3D-dopaminergic binding parameters into the clinical scoring system for PD.MethodsA total of 75 patients with PD who underwent 11C-methyl-N-2β-methyl ester-3β-(4-fluorophenyl) tropane (11C-CFT) PET/CT from April, 2019 to June, 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical characteristics, including age, sex, and disease duration, as well as the modified Hoehn-Yahr (H-Y) scale, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) parts II and III (II-III), and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores of PD patients during the corresponding time periods were collected. DAT binding parameters and their derived parameters based on plane and 3D images in the neostriatum were analyzed for consistency with plane and 3D parameters, and the correlation between DAT parameters and the clinical features of patients were assessed using SPSS software.ResultsThe DAT binding parameters derived from 3D images demonstrated good consistency with the plane parameters (p p p p p p p ConclusionsQuantitative parameters based on plane and 3D images of 11C-CFT PET/CT showed good consistency. Moreover, 3D parameters in the neostriatum had a stronger correlation with activities of daily living, UPDRS motor scores, disease severity and duration, and cognition compared with plane parameters in PD patients.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.