SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Osteocalcin and GPR158: linking bone and brain function.

Front Cell Dev Biol · 2025-04-23

DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2025.1564751PMID: 40337551

Open accessreview-article; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Osteocalcin (OCN), a small protein secreted by osteoblasts, has attracted significant attention for its role as an endocrine factor in regulating the central nervous system (CNS) via the bone-brain axis. As a critical receptor for OCN, G protein-coupled receptor 158 (GPR158) facilitates the proliferation, differentiation, and survival of neural cells while directly influencing neurons' structural and functional plasticity, thereby modulating cognitive function. Additionally, GPR158 is involved in cellular energy metabolism and interacts with proteins such as regulators of G protein signaling 7 (RGS7), broadening the understanding of OCN's impact on neural activity. Notably, GPR158 displays region- and cell type-specific bidirectional effects under certain pathological conditions, such as tumor development and mood regulation, adding complexity to its mechanisms of action. Although the precise biological mechanisms underlying the OCN/GPR158 signaling pathway remain incompletely understood, its association with neurodegenerative diseases (NDs), including Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Parkinson's disease (PD), is becoming increasingly evident. Thus, a systematic summary of OCN/GPR158 in CNS regulation and NDs will deepen understanding of its role in brain function and support the development of new therapeutic targets and strategies.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.