SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Clinical Features of Essential Tremor and its Impact on Quality of Life in Japan.

Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y) · 2025-05-07

DOI: 10.5334/tohm.1006PMID: 40351564

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundEssential tremor (ET) is primarily characterized by action tremor, but is also associated with various non-motor symptoms (NMS). However, the diagnostic relevance of NMS in ET remains unclear. This study aimed to compare NMS and motor symptoms of ET with those of Parkinson's disease-tremor dominant type (PD-TDT) and healthy controls (HCs) and to identify the presence and diagnostic relevance of NMS.MethodsTwenty-three ET patients, 23 PD-TDT patients, and 22 HCs were enrolled. Diagnoses of ET and PD were confirmed using Movement Disorder Society (MDS) criteria and Dopamine transporter single-photon emission computed tomography. Motor symptoms, NMS and quality of life (QOL) were evaluated using validated scales, including the Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST), MDS-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), Non-Motor Symptoms Scale for Parkinson's Disease (NMSS), Odor Stick Identification Test for Japanese (OSIT-J), and Quality of Life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire (QUEST).ResultsET patients had significantly higher NMSS total scores and MDS-UPDRS part IB scores than HCs, with more severe sleep disturbances, fatigue, and urinary problems. CRST scores were significantly correlated with QUEST scores. Logistic regression identified CRST Part B and OSIT-J as key factors distinguishing ET from PD-TDT, with 87% sensitivity and 90% specificity.DiscussionET patients showed more severe NMS than HCs. Differentiating ET from PD-TDT requires motor and sensory assessments, highlighting the diagnostic relevance of NMS. Comprehensive evaluation is essential for accurate diagnosis and management of ET.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.