SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Evaluation of Computer-Based Cognitive Training on Mild Cognitive Impairment in Parkinson's Disease (PD-MCI): Α Review.

J Clin Med · 2025-04-26

DOI: 10.3390/jcm14093001PMID: 40364031

Open accessreview-article; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Background/Objectives: Mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease (PD-MCI) affects approximately 20-50% of patients, and it is associated with an increased risk of dementia. Computer-assisted cognitive interventions (CCTs) have been proposed as a promising method of improving cognitive function in these patients. This review aims to (1) demonstrate the effectiveness of computer-based intervention in PD-MCI, and (2) determine the most effective iteration. Methods: A review was performed using PubMed, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect. Full texts of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) involving CCT intervention in PD-MCI and published in English language journals between 2014 and 2024 were included. Results: Of the 747 studies identified, 6 studies fulfilled the eligibility criterion for this review. Patients receiving CCTs showed significant improvements in global cognition and executive function, while mood was not significantly affected in most studies. Conclusions: CCT improves cognitive functions, particularly memory and executive abilities, but has little effect on mood. Although the results are encouraging, there are potential methodological biases that need to be considered.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.