SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Unraveling the Relation of Parkinson's Disease and Metabolites: A Combined Analysis of Stool and Plasma Metabolites Based on Untargeted Metabolomics Technology.

CNS Neurosci Ther · 2025-05-01

DOI: 10.1111/cns.70424PMID: 40376890

Open accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; research-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

ObjectiveMetabolomics technology has been widely utilized to uncover the action mechanisms of Parkinson's Disease (PD) and to identify PD-related biomarkers. In this study, we compared plasma and fecal metabolite levels between PD patients and their healthy spouses (HS), aiming to identify the associations of differential metabolites with intestinal inflammation, intestinal barrier function, and clinical characteristics of PD.MethodsUntargeted metabolomics techniques were used to characterize plasma and fecal metabolite profiles. We identified metabolites with elevated plasma levels in PD patients, while no significant differences were observed in fecal samples. Partial correlation analysis was employed to investigate the associations between these metabolites, markers of intestinal inflammation (calprotectin and lactoferrin), markers of intestinal permeability (α-1-antitrypsin and zonulin), and clinical characteristics of PD patients.ResultsThe study identified ten metabolites that were significantly elevated in the plasma of PD patients compared to HS (p ConclusionsThis study identified significant metabolite alterations in PD patients and revealed their associations with intestinal barrier dysfunction and clinical characteristics of the disease.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.