SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Relationship Between Depression and Neurodegeneration: Risk Factor, Prodrome, Consequence, or Something Else? A Scoping Review.

Biomedicines · 2025-04-23

DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines13051023PMID: 40426852

Open accessreview-article; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Background: The link between depression and neurodegeneration is complex and unclear. It is debated whether depression is a risk factor, a prodrome, a consequence, or unrelated. Objectives: This review examines these possibilities to clarify their connection, focusing primarily on Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, Parkinson's disease, and other highly comorbid neurodegenerative diseases. Methods: Eligibility criteria: The studies included in this review focused on neurodegenerative diseases with high comorbidity with depression, published in peer-reviewed English-language journals, providing empirical evidence on the link between the two conditions or theoretical frameworks that point to other studies. Non-human studies and those irrelevant to this connection were excluded. Source of evidence: AI-supported tools identified relevant articles. Results: Most studies suggest depression may contribute to neurodegeneration, but clinical, neuroimaging, and longitudinal evidence also support its role as a prodrome or consequence, indicating a bidirectional relationship. Conclusions: Despite extensive research, the connection remains unclear, highlighting the need for further investigation into underlying mechanisms and interdependencies, focusing on longitudinal studies by examining causality.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.