SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Clinical and Functional Connectivity Markers in Prediction of Hallucinations in Parkinson's Disease.

CNS Neurosci Ther · 2025-06-01

DOI: 10.1111/cns.70432PMID: 40485236

Open accessresearch-article; Multicenter Study; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

AimsLongitudinal studies addressing the predictive value of brain network connectivity in PD hallucinations are lacking. This study investigated whether functional connectivity markers could predict PD hallucinations independently of clinical markers.MethodsThis study used data from the Parkinson's Progression Marker Initiative, a longitudinal multicenter study that aims to identify biomarkers of PD progression. One hundred and three newly diagnosed PD patients (mean age 63.10 ± 9.70 years, 65 males) underwent clinical assessments and functional MRI scanning at baseline. Independent component analysis was used to explore intra-network and inter-network functional connectivity differences between PD patients who developed hallucinations and those who did not during the 2-year follow-up.ResultsTwenty patients developed hallucinations during the follow-up. At baseline, significantly decreased connectivity within the dorsal attention network (t = -6.65 ~ -4.90, p ConclusionsThe findings provide evidence that disrupted brain network connectivity is associated with a greater risk of future hallucinations in PD. This may aid in the early identification of PD patients at risk of hallucinations and provide a basis for the development of new therapies.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.