SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Test-retest properties of [<sup>11</sup>C]PXT012253 as a positron emission tomography (PET) radiotracer in healthy human brain: PET imaging of mGlu4.

EJNMMI Res · 2025-06-14

DOI: 10.1186/s13550-025-01266-yPMID: 40515979

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BACKGROUND: The metabotropic glutamate receptor 4 (mGlu4) has been proposed as a target for Parkinson’s disease to measure levodopa-induced dyskinesia. [11C]PXT012253 is a PET radioligand for mGlu4 (3.4 nM), previously characterized in non-human primates. We aimed to determine the optimal method for quantification, duration for acquisition, and test-retest reliability of the binding parameters for [11C]PXT012253 in healthy volunteers. RESULTS: Six subjects (4 females) completed. [11C]PXT012253 displayed high uptake and rapid wash-out. Unchanged [11C]PXT012253 at 20 min was 10–20%. VT in subcortical regions was higher than in cortical regions. 2TC provided better fits than 1TC. VT by Logan GA and MA1 analysis correlated with that of 2TC-CM. MA1 showed better identifiability and standard error than Logan. The test-retest metrics in pons, putamen and thalamus showed absolute variability of VT 0.93 using the 2TC, Logan and MA1 graphical analyses. Time stability analysis showed that VT values estimated using 63 min of imaging were within 10% of the values obtained with 93 min with all three models. CONCLUSION: [11C]PXT012253 showed a high brain uptake, with rapid washout and metabolism. VT was reliably estimated using 2TC, Logan GA and MA1. The test-retest metrics showed high repeatability, indicating [11C]PXT012253 to be a suitable PET radioligand for mGlu4.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.