SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

In silico identification of substrate-binding sites in type-1A α-synuclein amyloids.

Biophys J · 2025-06-18

DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2025.06.017PMID: 40538035

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Pathological amyloids associated with Parkinson and Alzheimer diseases have been shown to catalyze chemical reactions in vitro. To elucidate how small-molecule substrates interact with cross-β amyloid structures, we here employ computational approaches to investigate α-synuclein amyloid fibrils of the type-1A fold. Our initial binding pocket prediction analysis identified three distinct substrate-binding sites per protofilament, yielding a total of six sites in the dimeric type-1A amyloid structure. Molecular docking of the model phosphoester substrate para-nitrophenyl phosphate (pNPP), previously shown to be dephosphorylated by α-synuclein amyloids in vitro, was performed on the three identified sites. Docking was validated by molecular dynamics simulations for a period of 100 ns. The results revealed a pronounced preference for a single binding site (termed Site 2), as pNPP migrated to this region when primarily placed at the other two sites. Site 2 is located near the interface between the two protofilaments in a cavity enriched with lysine residues and histidine-50. Binding site analysis suggests stable, yet dynamic, interactions between pNPP and these residues in the α-synuclein amyloid fibril. Our work provides molecular-mechanistic details of the interaction between a small-molecule substrate and one α-synuclein amyloid polymorph. This framework may be extended to other reactive substrates and amyloid polymorphs.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.