SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Clonidine for Management of Agitation in Delirious Patients.

Curr Psychiatry Rep · 2025-06-21

DOI: 10.1007/s11920-025-01617-5PMID: 40542973

Open accessreview-article; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review explores clonidine as a potential treatment for agitation across various clinical contexts, focusing on its application in patients with limited cognitive reserve, hyperactive delirium, or conditions where standard treatments may exacerbate underlying symptoms, such as Parkinsonism. The review evaluates the pharmacological properties, efficacy, and practical considerations for using clonidine in managing agitation, including its role in other psychiatric and medical conditions. RECENT FINDINGS: Clonidine, a centrally acting alpha-2 adrenergic agonist, reduces norepinephrine release, leading to sedation, anxiolysis, and analgesia without significant respiratory depression. Recent studies and case reports highlight its utility in managing agitation, ADHD, autism spectrum disorders, dementia, and hyperactive delirium. Clonidine has demonstrated advantages over antipsychotics in preserving cognitive function and minimizing delirium duration. Additionally, it shows promise in treating PTSD-related nightmares and as an adjunct in anesthesia and analgesia. Clonidine offers a well-tolerated, cost-effective alternative to antipsychotics for managing agitation, particularly in vulnerable populations. Its diverse applications, favorable safety profile, and minimal impact on Parkinsonism make it a valuable tool in psychiatry and medicine. Further research is needed to refine dosing protocols and expand its indications in managing agitation and related symptoms.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.