SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Meta-Analysis of Exercise Effects on Cognition in Persons with Parkinson's Disease.

NeuroSci · 2025-05-23

DOI: 10.3390/neurosci6020046PMID: 40559207

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundParkinson's disease (PD) is a debilitating neurodegenerative disorder affecting millions of people worldwide. PD results in motor and cognitive dysfunction. While there is no proven cure for PD, it is widely agreed that aerobic exercises and occupations can help slow the progression of the disease and keep some motor-related symptoms from developing. The most effective forms of exercise to slow the progression of motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease have also been studied.Research questionThis research article aims to compare the differences in outcomes of exercise on cognitive outcomes in Parkinson's Disease, as evaluated by meta-analysis.MethodsKey terms were Parkinson's Disease and exercise terms. These search terms were then entered to electronic databases-Ovid MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and CINAHL-from March 2018 to May 2023. An ancestral bibliography was also performed.ResultsTwo reviewers screened the title and abstract records (n = 528) found in the initial search. Our review identified 18 studies which met inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. The meta-analysis found an effect of exercise on cognition of patients with PD (d = -0.03) which was not significant (CI95% of -0.13 p > 0.05, as the CI includes zero). Additionally, the homogeneity analysis was not significant (Q (17) = 2.83; p > 0.05).

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.