SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Exploring the Impact of Dopaminergic Treatment on Creative Expression in Parkinson's Disease: A Scoping Review.

J Clin Med · 2025-06-10

DOI: 10.3390/jcm14124119PMID: 40565865

Open accessreview-article; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Background/Objectives: Creativity is a complex cognitive process influenced by multiple factors, including neurobiological mechanisms and neurotransmitter regulation. In Parkinson's disease (PD), dopaminergic therapy has been associated with both increases and decreases in creative output, raising questions about its underlying mechanisms and clinical relevance. Methods: A scoping review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines to evaluate studies assessing the effects of dopaminergic therapy on creativity in PD patients. The search was performed in January 2025 across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase databases using predefined search terms. Results: Seven studies met the inclusion criteria, reporting mixed outcomes. Some found enhanced artistic expression and divergent thinking in patients treated with dopamine agonists, while others observed no significant change. Increased creativity appeared more common in individuals with pre-existing artistic tendencies rather than as a new emergence due to medication. Conclusions: Dopaminergic therapy may amplify pre-existing creative inclinations in PD patients but does not consistently induce creativity across individuals.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.