SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Genetic basis of maneb-induced dopaminergic neurodegeneration in Drosophila.

G3 (Bethesda) · 2025-09-01

DOI: 10.1093/g3journal/jkaf159PMID: 40644377

Open accessresearch-article; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a complex neurodegenerative disease driven by combined genetic and environmental factors. Human studies support increased PD risk following exposure to the pesticide maneb yet animal studies generally report subtle or no dopaminergic phenotypes unless maneb is combined with additional pesticides. Consequently, it is unclear whether exposure to maneb alone promotes degeneration of dopamine (DA) neurons and if so, what the underlying mechanisms are. We hypothesized that gene-environment interactions are major determinants of maneb-mediated neurodegeneration and in support of this we find that DA neuron viability is divergent among 186 maneb-exposed genetically varying fly strains from the Drosophila Genetic Reference Panel. Through genome-wide association analysis we identify several candidate genetic modifiers of maneb-induced DA neurodegeneration and further validate 2 candidate genes, fz2 and CG14186 which we find potentiate maneb-induced DA neurodegeneration when knocked down. fz2 and the mammalian ortholog of CG14186 (TMEM237) are both thought to be necessary for intact Wnt pathway signaling in nervous system development and maintenance. Accordingly, we find that adult-specific perturbation of Wnt signaling is sufficient to promote maneb-induced DA neuron loss. Collectively, these results support a role for gene-environment interactions in PD etiology and reveal candidate mediators of maneb-related DA neurodegeneration in vivo.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.