Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
Adenylyl cyclases (ACs) are key regulators of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) signaling-a pathway critical for neuroregeneration, synaptic plasticity, and neuronal survival. In both the central and peripheral nervous systems, injury-induced activation of ACs promotes axonal outgrowth and functional recovery through the stimulation of protein kinase A (PKA), exchange proteins directly activated by cAMP (Epac), and cAMP-response element-binding protein (CREB). Among the various AC isoforms, calcium-sensitive AC1, AC8, and AC5, as well as bicarbonate-responsive soluble AC (sAC), have emerged as crucial mediators of neuroplasticity and axon regeneration. These isoforms coordinate diverse cellular responses-including gene transcription, cytoskeletal remodeling, and neurotransmitter release-to metabolic, synaptic, and injury-related signals. Dysregulation of AC activity has been implicated in the pathophysiology of neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, as well as in chronic pain syndromes. Pharmacological modulation of cAMP levels through AC activation, phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibition, or pituitary adenylyl cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) receptor signaling has shown therapeutic promise in preclinical models by enhancing neurogenesis, remyelination, and synaptic repair. Conversely, targeted inhibition of specific AC isoforms, particularly AC1, has demonstrated efficacy in reducing maladaptive plasticity and neuropathic pain. This review highlights the diverse roles of ACs in neuronal function and injury response and discusses emerging strategies for their therapeutic targeting.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.