SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Is the Voltage-Dependent Anion Channel a Major Player in Neurodegenerative Diseases?

Int J Mol Sci · 2025-06-26

DOI: 10.3390/ijms26136138PMID: 40649921

Open accessreview-article; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

The family of voltage-dependent anion channels (VDACs) comprises three isoforms (VDAC-1, VDAC-2, VDAC-3). VDACs have been extensively described as localised in the outer mitochondrial membrane where they are involved in the exchange of ions, metabolites, and ATP/ADP between mitochondria and cytosol. The VDAC interacts with disease-specific proteins and thus regulates the mitochondrial function and controls the cellular energy resources, explaining its involvement in cell death and apoptosis. In addition, VDAC-1 and -2 can also be found at other cellular locations such as in the sarcoplasmic reticulum, in the endoplasmic reticulum, as well as in the plasma membrane. Through single-channel pore regulation, oligomerisation, or changed expression levels the VDAC is involved in different neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Huntington's disease, and others. Here, we critically summarise current discussions about the VDAC as a common key player for these diseases. We suggest that the VDAC acts as a transmembrane multifunctional regulatory protein which might serve as a pharmacological target for the development of novel drugs against neurodegenerative diseases such as the application of recombinant antibody technology.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.