SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Ceruloplasmin and Ferritin Changes in Ocular Fluids from Patients with Vitreoretinal Diseases: Relation with Neuroinflammation and Drusen Formation.

Int J Mol Sci · 2025-06-30

DOI: 10.3390/ijms26136307PMID: 40650085

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

This pilot study explored whether the ceruloplasmin (CP) and ferritin (FT) levels in ocular fluids could serve as biomarkers for early neurodegenerative diseases (Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and other dementias). CP and FT are known to modulate neurodegenerative tissue responses. We analysed aqueous and vitreous samples from 26 patients (8M/18F, aged 60-85) who were undergoing elective vitreoretinal (VR) surgery. Of these, 14 had idiopathic epiretinal membranes (ERMs), 6 had idiopathic macular holes (MH), and 6 were patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) who presented with VR disorders (VRDs). CP, FT, and selected neuroinflammatory mediators such as interferon γ (IFN-γ), interleukin (IL-6), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), nerve growth factor (NGF), and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) were quantified. Odds ratio analysis was applied to assess the CP/FT ratio's association with subretinal drusen. We found distinct CP and FT profiles in VRD samples. In aqueous fluid, the CP increased and the FT decreased in early-stage ERM, which reduced the CP/FT ratio. Similar patterns were observed in vitreous fluid. The CP levels correlated with the VEGF (aqueous), IL-4 (vitreous), NGF, and BDNF levels; FT correlated with IL-6 and NGF. A higher CP/FT ratio was associated with increased risk for neurodegenerative conditions. Our findings support the quantification of CP and FT in ocular fluids as a promising approach for identifying early neurodegenerative changes and suggest that the CP/FT ratio may be linked to drusen imaging and clinical neurodegenerative history.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.