Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
Parkinson's disease (PD) is considered the second most common neurodegenerative disease worldwide; treating this disease remains quite challenging. Environmental and genetic factors may play a role in the pathophysiology of PD. α-synuclein aggregation, oxidative stress, ferroptosis, mitochondrial failure, neuroinflammation, and gut dysbiosis are among the known risk factors of PD. The pathophysiology of Parkinson's disease is complicated by the interconnections between these molecular pathways, which also present significant obstacles to treatment development. However, due to its complex mechanism and long latency, PD is difficult to diagnose and detect, which presents a barrier to treatment. In addition, the need to develop new treatments for PD is increased by the fact that the majority of traditional therapeutic methods have major side effects and limited effects. Therefore, a deeper understanding of the fundamental mechanisms underlying PD is required. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the current landscape of PD pathophysiology, paying particular attention to the molecular processes of PD, as well as the traditional research models, clinical diagnostic standards, documented medication therapeutic approaches, and recently disclosed drug candidates in clinical trials. We also highlighted the herbal-derived components that have recently been identified for their effects in the treatment of PD to provide a review and perspectives for the development of the next generation of drugs and preparations for the treatment of PD.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.