Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
With the global population aging, the incidence of neurodegenerative diseases (NDs), such as Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, Huntington's disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, has been progressively increasing. However, effective therapeutic strategies and clinical drugs for these disorders remain scarce. Curcumin, a natural polyphenolic compound primarily derived from the herbaceous plant Curcuma longa L., has been proposed as a promising candidate for ND treatment based on the excellent antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective properties. Its pharmacological activities encompass scavenging reactive oxygen species, mitigating toxic protein aggregation and cytotoxicity, repairing mitochondrial dysfunction, and inhibiting excessive neuronal apoptosis. Compared with synthetic drugs, curcumin demonstrates a more favorable safety profile with fewer side effects. Nevertheless, its clinical application is substantially hindered by poor bioavailability, which stems from low aqueous solubility, inefficient intestinal absorption, and rapid metabolism and systemic elimination. Conventional administration methods often fail to achieve effective concentrations in vivo. Further clinical trials are also required to validate the therapeutic efficacy and potential adverse effects in human subjects. This article systematically reviews the pathogenesis of NDs and the knowledge on curcumin including pharmacological effects, neuroprotective mechanisms, functions across specific NDs and advanced strategies to enhance the bioavailability, with the aim of promoting the development and clinical translation of curcumin-based therapeutics for NDs.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.