Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
BackgroundParoxysmal abdominalgia (PxA) is an underrecognized, debilitating form of abdominal pain that manifests during wearing-off (WO) periods in Parkinson's disease (PD). Despite its profound impact, PxA remains poorly described, complicating diagnosis and management.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective case series of patients with PD and recurrent abdominal pain linked to WO episodes. Demographic, clinical, and detailed pain data were extracted from records. Patients with alternative gastrointestinal (GI) causes were excluded. Data were analyzed descriptively and compared with existing literature.ResultsFive patients (3 males, mean disease duration 14.4 years) met inclusion criteria. PxA was characterized by severe abdominal pain-described as twisting, squeezing, or tightness-that consistently occurred during WO states and frequently led to emergency department visits and repeated GI evaluations which were unremarkable. Symptoms were often associated with anxiety and panic attacks. Standard analgesics and GI therapies were largely ineffective. Extra carbidopa/levodopa doses provided variable relief; apomorphine bolus injections and continuous subcutaneous foslevodopa/foscarbidopa infusion appeared to offer significant benefit in eligible patients. PxA symptoms aligned best with the nociplastic category of the PD Pain Classification System.ConclusionsPxA is a severe, non-motor complication of PD that likely represents a form of nociplastic pain linked to dopaminergic fluctuations. Increased awareness is needed to reduce misdiagnosis and inappropriate interventions. Further research is required to elucidate underlying mechanisms and guide targeted therapy.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.