SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

The Effects of Pilates in Parkinson's Disease-A Narrative Review.

Life (Basel) · 2025-06-29

DOI: 10.3390/life15071035PMID: 40724537

Open accessreview-article; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Parkinson's disease (PD) is one of the most well-known neurodegenerative diseases. Axial symptoms of PD include tremors in the arms and legs, stiffness of the muscles in the limbs and trunk, slow movement, impaired coordination, and balance disorders. Progressive disability increases the risk of falls and leads to immobilization of the patient. Comprehensive rehabilitation plays a very important role in the treatment process and serves mainly to improve motor functions and balance. In recent years, traditional methods of rehabilitation have been enriched by sometimes unconventional modern methods, which are attractive to patients. Unfortunately, current scientific evidence for the effectiveness of these methods is insufficient. Unconventional methods being used increasingly often in the rehabilitation of patients with PD include mind-body interventions. One of these interventions is Pilates exercise, which works on a physical and mental level. In this narrative review, we present the state of the art on the effects of Pilates exercise on balance and motor functions in PD. Previous studies, the results of which are available in scientific reports, have not provided convincing evidence for the effectiveness of these methods. Between 2019 and 2024, four systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the use of Pilates in the rehabilitation of patients with PD were published. Most of the reports show many shortcomings: too small groups of patients; frequent methodological errors, such as a lack of randomization and insufficient inclusion and exclusion criteria; imprecise descriptions of the interventions; different intensities and frequencies of exercises; too different outcome measures; and poorly chosen methods of statistical evaluation. Therefore, many authors emphasize the need for further, better-planned research.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.