SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Minimal Clinically Important Difference of Average Daily Steps Measured Through a Consumer Smartwatch in People With Mild-to-Moderate Parkinson Disease: Cross-Sectional Study.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth · 2025-07-29

DOI: 10.2196/64213PMID: 40734369

Open accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; research-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundRecent studies demonstrated the validity, reliability, and accuracy of consumer smartwatches for measuring daily steps in people with Parkinson disease (PD). However, no study to date has estimated the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for average daily steps (avDS), measured through a consumer smartwatch in people with PD.ObjectiveThis study aimed to calculate the MCID of avDS, measured through a commercial smartwatch (Garmin Vivosmart 4) in people with PD.MethodsPeople with PD with a disease stage ResultsA total of 100 people with PD were enrolled. Participants took on average 5949 (SD 3034) daily steps, ranging from 357 to 12,620. The MCID of avDS anchored to standardized measures of motor symptoms and mobility was 581 steps/day (range  554-608) or around 10% of mean avDS in our population. The MCID of avDS anchored to clinical and health-related variables was 1200 steps/day (range  350-1683), or around 20% of mean avDS in our population. Finally, the MCID of avDS anchored to disease-related patient-reported outcomes was 1592 steps/day (range 594-2589), or around 27% of the mean avDS in our population.ConclusionsThese findings could be relevant for designing future clinical trials involving avDS as a digital mobility outcome in daily life for people with PD and evaluating the effectiveness of the intervention promoting free-living walking in this population.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.