SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Brain structural MRI marker for predicting conversion to Parkinson's disease in individuals with prodromal symptoms.

Front Aging Neurosci · 2025-07-16

DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2025.1579326PMID: 40741046

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundDuring the prodromal stage of Parkinson's disease (PD), brain structural alterations precede clinical diagnosis and offer opportunities for early detection. We investigated whether combining clinical non-motor markers with an MRI-based brain structural marker could enhance predictive performance for PD conversion.MethodsIndividuals with prodromal symptoms (n = 46, 63.5 ± 7.6 years, 24 males) were selected from the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative dataset. We developed a machine learning classifier to identify individuals with brain structural patterns similar to PD based on cortical thickness and white matter integrity. Its predictive performance for PD conversion was assessed alone and combined with clinical non-motor markers such as rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder and olfactory dysfunction.ResultsSix individuals converted to PD within 4 years. The MRI marker classified 21 individuals as having PD-like brain patterns, including all six converters. When combined with olfactory dysfunction, the approach achieved optimal performance with 100% sensitivity, 80% specificity, and 90% balanced accuracy, outperforming individual markers and other combinations.ConclusionMRI-quantified brain structural similarity to PD, particularly when combined with olfactory assessment, significantly enhances prediction of PD conversion in individuals with prodromal symptoms. This accessible, multimodal approach could facilitate early identification of high-risk individuals for targeted interventions and clinical trials.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.