SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

N-Propargylpyrrolidine-based butyrylcholinesterase and monoamine oxidase inhibitors.

Chem Biol Interact · 2025-07-30

DOI: 10.1016/j.cbi.2025.111681PMID: 40750068

Check source for accessJournal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) inhibitors are or could be used for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease, canine cognitive dysfunction, depression, multiple sclerosis, heroin abuse and metabolic disorders. Monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors are or could be used for the treatment of depression, anxiety, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, cancer, cardiovascular disease and chronic inflammatory diseases. We have designed, synthesized, and evaluated ten new N-propargylpyrrolidine-based inhibitors of these enzymes. Sulfonamide 10 is the most potent human (h)BChE (IC50 = 0.203 μM) of the series, and secondary carboxamide 1 is a time-dependent and irreversible inhibitor of hMAO-A (IC50 = 6.42 μM) and hMAO-B (IC50 = 7.83 μM). The X-ray crystal structures of carboxamide 4 [IC50(hBChE) = 3.89 μM] and sulfonamide 10 with hBChE confirmed our previous observation that carboxamides and sulfonamides have distinct binding poses in the active site of hBChE. The X-ray crystal structure of the complex of pyrrolidine 4 with hBChE also revealed a distinct binding pose compared to its direct piperidine analogue (PDB code 5LKR). Furthermore, compounds 1 and 10 should be able to cross the blood-brain barrier, exhibit low cytotoxicity (>50 μM) in two cell lines and protect against amyloid β1-42-induced neuronal cell death.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.