SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Age-related trends in amyloid positivity in Parkinson's disease without dementia.

Aging (Albany NY) · 2025-08-06

DOI: 10.18632/aging.206297PMID: 40772791

Open accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; research-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Amyloid-beta (Aβ) plays a pivotal role in cognitive decline in Parkinson's disease (PD). The prevalence of amyloid positivity, evaluated using the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients with PD without dementia in their sixties, is lower than that in individuals with normal cognition without PD diagnosis in the same age range. However, it is unclear whether this is also the case in patients with PD without dementia in their eighties. Eighty-nine patients with PD without dementia were retrospectively classified into two groups with a cut-off age of 73 years at diagnosis: a HIGH group and a LOW group, with mean age at diagnosis of 80.2 and 64.9 years, respectively. The prevalence of amyloid positivity was significantly higher in the HIGH (30.6%) than in the LOW group (10.0%) (p = 0.02). The prevalence of amyloid positivity in both groups was lower than that in participants with normal cognition in the same age range. Our findings may be attributed to the shorter preclinical stage of asymptomatic cerebral Aβ deposition in PD, resulting from Aβ accelerating the transition from the asymptomatic to dementia stage. We believe that our findings will incentivize further studies to identify the best disease-modifying therapy for early PD without dementia.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.