SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Leveraging open cheminformatics tools for non-targeted metabolomics analysis of C. elegans: a workflow comparison and application to strains related to xenobiotic metabolism and neurodegeneration.

Anal Bioanal Chem · 2025-08-08

DOI: 10.1007/s00216-025-06048-yPMID: 40775120

Open accessComparative Study; research-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) is a well-established nematode model for studying metabolism and neurodegenerative disorders, such as Alzheimer's (AD) and Parkinson's disease (PD). Non-targeted metabolomics via liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) has proven useful for uncovering metabolic changes in biological systems. Here, we present workflows for C. elegans metabolomics, leveraging advanced open science tools. We compared two metabolite extraction methods: a monophasic extraction, which provided broader metabolite coverage in analyses conducted in hydrophilic interaction with positive polarity (HILIC POS), and a biphasic extraction, which yielded more features in reverse-phase C18 chromatography with negative polarity (RPLC NEG) analyses. Data were processed using patRoon, integrating IPO, XCMS, CAMERA, and MetFrag, which incorporated PubChemLite compounds and C. elegans-specific metabolites from an expanded WormJam database enhanced with PubChem and literature sources. MS-DIAL was also employed for data processing, allowing for expanded annotations with predicted spectra for the expanded WormJam metabolites calculated using CFM-ID. Significant metabolite differences were identified when comparing the Bristol (N2) wild-type strain with two knockout strains of xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes and two transgenic strains related to neurodegenerative pathways. Pooled quality control (QC) samples for each strain ensured robust data quality and the detection of strain-related metabolites. Our study demonstrates the potential of non-targeted metabolomics for metabolite discovery employing open science tools in model organisms.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.