SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

How to dose extended-release carbidopa-levodopa capsules (IPX203, CREXONT®) in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Clin Park Relat Disord · 2025-06-18

DOI: 10.1016/j.prdoa.2025.100357PMID: 40799912

Open accessreview-article; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

IPX203 (CREXONT®) is a novel, oral, extended-release (ER) carbidopa-levodopa (CD-LD) formulation, designed to rapidly achieve LD plasma concentrations similar to immediate-release (IR) CD-LD and to maintain LD concentrations for a longer duration than other oral CD-LD products. In the pivotal phase 3 clinical trial, IPX203 provided superior clinical benefit with fewer doses than IR CD-LD. Since the plasma concentration profile of IPX203 is different from that of IR LD, converting patients treated with IR LD to IPX203 requires a conversion strategy. In the pivotal phase 3 trial, patients on IR CD-LD were converted to IPX203 based on the most frequent single dose of the patient's stable dosing regimen of IR CD-LD. IPX203 was initially administered 3 times per day for most patients. Further titration was then undertaken based on clinical response, and patients were dosed 2 to 4 times per day. Of 589 patients previously treated with IR CD-LD, 506 patients completed the conversion to IPX203; the mg conversion ratio for individual doses was 2.8 at the beginning of the dose-conversion period and 2.9 after titration to clinical response, with the majority of IPX203 patients (84%) dosed 3 times per day.ObjectiveTo provide guidance on dosing of IPX203 (CREXONT®) in clinical practice.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.