Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
Neurodegenerative diseases (NDDs) such as Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, ALS, and Huntington's pose a growing global challenge due to their complex pathobiology and aging demographics. Once considered as cellular debris, small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) are now recognized as active mediators of intercellular signaling in NDD progression. These nanovesicles (~30-150 nm), capable of crossing the blood-brain barrier, carry pathological proteins, RNAs, and lipids, facilitating the spread of toxic species like Aβ, tau, TDP-43, and α-synuclein. sEVs are increasingly recognized as valuable diagnostic tools, outperforming traditional CSF biomarkers in early detection and disease monitoring. On the therapeutic front, engineered sEVs offer a promising platform for CNS-targeted delivery of siRNAs, CRISPR tools, and neuroprotective agents, demonstrating efficacy in preclinical models. However, translational hurdles persist, including standardization, scalability, and regulatory alignment. Promising solutions are emerging, such as CRISPR-based barcoding, which enables high-resolution tracking of vesicle biodistribution; AI-guided analytics to enhance quality control; and coordinated regulatory efforts by the FDA, EMA, and ISEV aimed at unifying identity and purity criteria under forthcoming Minimal Information for Studies of Extracellular Vesicles (MISEV) guidelines. This review critically examines the mechanistic roles, diagnostic potential, and therapeutic applications of sEVs in NDDs, and outlines key strategies for clinical translation.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.