SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Diagnostics of olfactory dysfunction in Parkinson's disease - a literature overview and case series.

Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub · 2025-08-13

DOI: 10.5507/bp.2025.021PMID: 40823773

Check source for accessReview; Journal Article; Case ReportsOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Olfactory dysfunction is increasingly recognised for its predictive value as an early indicator of a number of degenerative neuropathologies including Parkinson's Disease (PD). In this overview, we cover the relationship between PD and olfactory dysfunction (OD). Prodromal premotor symptoms of PD include sleep disturbances, psychiatric disorders, constipation and OD. The latter can precede motor symptoms by several years and its occurrence is frequent in Parkinson s disease with a prevalence that can range from 45%-90%. Olfactory perception in these cases can be tested using subjective and objective methods. Commonly used psychophysical tests in the Czech Republic include Sniffin' Sticks Tests and the Odorized Marker Test but these may be inaccurate and demanding on patients with cognitive deficits in addition to motor symptoms. For these reasons, objective electrophysiological olfactory tests that depend on olfactory/trigeminal event-related potentials (OERPs/TERPs) for example are more useful. In this paper we describe a series of case reports, demonstrating the importance of comprehensive olfactory examination. The significance of objective electrophysiological olfactory/ trigeminal tests in the diagnosis of PD, is underscored given the rising incidence of this condition and the need for early diagnosis.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.