SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Cathepsins in Neurological Diseases.

Int J Mol Sci · 2025-08-15

DOI: 10.3390/ijms26167886PMID: 40869205

Open accessreview-article; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Cathepsins, a family of lysosomal proteases, play critical roles in maintaining cellular homeostasis through protein degradation and modulation of immune responses. In the central nervous system (CNS), their functions extend beyond classical proteolysis, influencing neuroinflammation, synaptic remodeling, and neurodegeneration. Emerging evidence underscores the crucial role of microglial cathepsins in the pathophysiology of several neurological disorders. This review synthesizes current knowledge on the involvement of cathepsins in a spectrum of CNS diseases, including Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, multiple sclerosis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, epilepsy, Huntington's disease, and ischemic stroke. We highlight how specific cathepsins contribute to disease progression by modulating key pathological processes such as α-synuclein and amyloid-β clearance, tau degradation, lysosomal dysfunction, neuroinflammation, and demyelination. Notably, several cathepsins demonstrate both neuroprotective and pathogenic roles depending on disease context and expression levels. Additionally, the balance between cathepsins and their endogenous inhibitors, such as cystatins, emerges as a critical factor in CNS pathology. While cathepsins represent promising biomarkers and therapeutic targets, significant gaps remain in our understanding of their mechanistic roles across diseases. Future studies focusing on their regulation, substrate specificity, and interplay with genetic and epigenetic factors may yield novel strategies for early diagnosis and disease-modifying treatments in neurology.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.