SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Comparison of Two α-Synuclein Seed Amplification Assays for Discrimination of Parkinson Disease and Atypical Parkinsonism.

Mov Disord · 2025-08-20

DOI: 10.1002/mds.70017PMID: 40879244

Open accessComparative Study; brief-report; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundSeed amplification assays (SAAs) for misfolded α-synuclein (syn) have shown inconsistent results in multiple system atrophy (MSA).ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to compare a novel syn SAA (synSAA) that distinguishes between Lewy body disease (LBD) and MSA syn-seeds (Amprion-SAA) with an LBD-specific synSAA (IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna [ISNB]-SAA).MethodsWe applied both assays to cerebrospinal fluid samples from 114 patients with MSA, 49 patients with Parkinson disease (PD), 40 patients with progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), and 46 controls.ResultsAmprion-SAA detected type 2 ("MSA-type") syn-seeds in 101 (88.6%) MSA, 3 (6.1%) PD, 4 (10.0%) PSP, and 6 (13.0%) control participants, and type 1 ("LBD-type") syn-seeds in 39 (79.6%) PD, 3 (2.6%) MSA, and 1 (2.5%) PSP participant. ISNB-SAA detected LBD-specific syn-seeds in 40 (81.6%) PD, 4 (3.5%) MSA, and none of the PSP or control participants.ConclusionsAmprion-SAA, performed at ISNB, uniquely discriminated MSA from both PD and PSP participants with good accuracy. However, it showed lower specificity than ISNB-SAA, primarily related to the type 2 profile. © 2025 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.