SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Prevalence and Clinical Correlates of Sleep Disorders in RFC1-Spectrum Disorders: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Mov Disord · 2025-07-21

DOI: 10.1002/mds.30279PMID: 40879541

Open accessbrief-report; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundSleep disturbances in RFC1-spectrum disorders remain unexplored. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and characteristics of sleep disorders in patients with RFC1-spectrum disorders and their impact on quality of life (QoL).MethodsPatients underwent a comprehensive sleep assessment using validated questionnaires, polysomnography, and QoL evaluation.ResultsAmong 16 participants, 15 (94%) had obstructive sleep apnea: severe in four, moderate in nine, and mild in two. Restless legs syndrome affected 12 patients (75%), with moderate-to-severe symptoms in 11. Periodic limb movements during sleep exceeded the clinical threshold in 10 patients (63%). Rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder was identified in 1 patient. Subjective assessments revealed poor sleep quality in 11 patients (69%) and insomnia in 10 (63%). All patients exhibited reduced QoL. Reduction in slow-wave sleep and REM sleep are associated with increased clinical severity.ConclusionRFC1-spectrum disorders are associated with a high prevalence of sleep disorders and impaired QoL, highlighting the need for screening. © 2025 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.