SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

The Evolution of Functional Amyloids and Their Impact on Host-Microbe Interactions.

Adv Sci (Weinh) · 2025-09-03

DOI: 10.1002/advs.202510109PMID: 40899597

Open accessreview-article; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Amyloids are highly ordered β-sheet-rich structures that are well conserved across the domains of life. Amyloids have a unique repetitive structure that enables autocatalytic self-replication. This property is most well-known in the context of neurodegeneration, in which proteins misfold into amyloid and begin an amyloid cascade resulting in the deposition of large amyloid aggregates characteristic of various diseases such as Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease. The amyloid fold, however, can be pathological or functional. The repetitive nature of amyloids positions self-replicating amyloids as a potential key player in the origin of life. This may explain why, despite the pathogenic potential of amyloids, the amyloid fold is readily found. Many amyloids are not pathogenic and instead they contribute positively to the overall fitness of the cell. Bacteria, for example, use functional amyloids to facilitate biofilm formation, dissemination, storage, adhesion to cells or surfaces, and virulence. Interestingly, the high conservation of the amyloid fold and its ability to self-replicate enables bacterial functional amyloids to accelerate amyloid-associated disease in a human host. Here, the structure, conservation, and biology of the bacterial functional amyloids, as well as their impact on human health, are discussed.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.