SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Faster disease progression in Parkinson's disease with glucocerebrosidase genotype: But not apparent immediate from diagnosis.

J Parkinsons Dis · 2025-09-03

DOI: 10.1177/1877718x251361507PMID: 40899843

Open accessresearch-article; Randomized Controlled Trial; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundThis study presents post-hoc analyses of the LEAP study focusing on disease progression in patients with early Parkinson's disease (PD) who either have a glucocerebrosidase gene (GBA1) mutation (GBA1mut) or do not have a mutation (GBA1wt) over a period of up to five years.ObjectiveTo investigate the difference in disease progression between GBA1mut and GBA1wt over 80 weeks and five years.MethodsThe study analyzed the difference in disease progression between GBA1mut and GBA1wt using the UPDRS and its subscales, Levy A and B scores, and the difference in levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD) over 80 weeks and five years, with mixed-effects regression models.ResultsThe GBA1 mutation carrier status was determined in 394 patients, with 52 being GBA1mut and 342 being GBA1wt. From baseline to 80 weeks, the change in total UPDRS score was similar for GBA1mut and GBA1wt (difference 1.7 points in favor of GBA1mut, p = 0.38). From baseline to five years, GBA1mut had 5.9 points (p = 0.04) more worsening of total UPDRS compared to GBA1wt and GBA1mut had 1.0 point (p = 0.02) more deterioration in UPDRS subscale IV, related to therapy complications, compared to GBA1wt. There were no significant between-group differences in changes in UPDRS subscales, Levy A and B scores, and LEDD.ConclusionsThese findings suggest that over the long term, PD patients with a GBA1 mutation experience faster disease progression compared to those without a GBA1 mutation, although this difference in progression was not apparent within the initial 80 weeks of the trial.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.