SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Utilizing T1-weighted MRI intensity indices to evaluate in-vivo neurotoxicity in a South African cohort with environmental manganese exposure.

J Trace Elem Med Biol · 2025-08-22

DOI: 10.1016/j.jtemb.2025.127732PMID: 40907163

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundExcessive exposure to manganese (Mn) causes parkinsonism. Occupational Mn exposure is associated with increased T1-weighted globus pallidus signal on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) secondary to in-vivo Mn deposition.MethodsThe present study evaluated the T1-weighted pallidal index (PI) as an in-vivo marker of Mn exposure and neurotoxicity in chronic environmental Mn exposure. A total of 53 Black South African participants with a range of residential environmental Mn exposures due to proximity to one of the world's largest smelters underwent T1-weighted MRI.ResultsThe PI was associated with parkinsonism as measured by the total Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor subsection part 3 (UPDRS3) in all participants (β=0.10, confidence interval 0.01, 0.18). Further, the PI was positively associated with total UPDRS3 scores (β=0.14, confidence interval 0.03, 0.25) and the lower limb rigidity subscore (β=0.04, confidence interval 0.005, 0.07) among those who regularly consumed alcohol (>3 drinks/week), but not in those who occasionally consumed alcohol (ConclusionOur findings suggest T1-weighted PI is associated with clinical neurotoxicity in environmental Mn exposure. This association is amplified by regular consumption of alcohol.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.