SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Current therapeutic strategies in Parkinson's disease: Future perspectives.

Mol Cells · 2025-09-04

DOI: 10.1016/j.mocell.2025.100274PMID: 40914459

Open accessreview-article; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by the loss of dopaminergic neurons and the accumulation of misfolded α-synuclein. Current treatments, including dopaminergic medications and deep brain stimulation, provide symptomatic relief but do not halt disease progression. Recent advances in molecular research have enabled the development of disease-modifying strategies targeting key pathogenic mechanisms, such as α-synuclein aggregation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and genetic mutations, including LRRK2 and GBA1. In parallel, pluripotent stem cell-derived dopaminergic neurons have emerged as a scalable and ethically viable source for cell replacement therapy. Early-phase clinical trials have demonstrated the safety and functional integration of these grafts. Ongoing research is now focused on enhancing graft purity, immune compatibility, and anatomical precision, including homotopic transplantation and circuit-level reconstruction. Together, these emerging strategies offer the potential to shift PD treatment paradigms by combining symptomatic control with long-term neural restoration. This review summarizes current therapeutic approaches and highlights recent advances in disease-modifying and regenerative interventions for PD.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.