SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Spotlight on USP30: structure, function, disease and target inhibition.

Front Pharmacol · 2025-08-22

DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1629709PMID: 40918504

Open accessreview-article; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

This review comprehensively summarizes the current understanding of ubiquitin-specific protease 30 (USP30), covering its structural characteristics, functions in cellular processes, associations with diseases, diagnostic and therapeutic strategies, as well as controversies and future perspectives. USP30, a deubiquitinating enzyme, plays crucial roles in mitochondrial quality control, autophagy regulation, and cellular homeostasis. It is implicated in the progression of several malignancies, including hepatocellular carcinoma, breast carcinoma, and glioblastoma, as well as neurodegenerative disorders such as Parkinson's disease. This involvement is mediated through its regulation of mitochondrial autophagy, stabilization of oncoproteins like Snail and c-Myc, and facilitation of metabolic reprogramming. Inhibition of USP30 has demonstrated potential in reversing the malignant phenotype of tumors and enhancing neuroprotection, highlighting its promise as a versatile therapeutic target. Pharmacological inhibition of USP30, using agents such as S3, MF-094, and FT3967385, enhances ubiquitination and reactivates mitophagy, indicating potential therapeutic benefits in preclinical models. The development of USP30-targeted therapies holds promise but also faces challenges. Further research on USP30 is expected to provide new insights into disease mechanisms and therapeutic interventions.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.