SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Stem cells therapy in neurodegenerative and neuroimmune diseases: Current status of treatments and future prospects.

Pharmacol Res · 2025-09-20

DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2025.107960PMID: 40976462

Check source for accessReview; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Neurodegenerative and neuroimmune diseases, such as multiple sclerosis (MS), Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) share a common pathologic hallmark i.e. loss of neurons in the central nervous system (CNS), despite diverse pathological manifestations. These diseases present major challenges to global health due to incurable or extremely difficult to treat, imposing a heavy burden on society and families. Stem cell therapy, as a novel promising approach for treating various neurological diseases, harnesses the regenerative potential of stem cells to repair damaged neural tissues and circuits, and has become the only hope for patients to recover their health or delay the deterioration of disease symptoms. In recent years, researchers have successfully generated neurons from multiple types of stem cells, and good curative effects have been achieved in their animal models and in clinical trials. This comprehensive review elaborates on the relevant content of stem cell biology, focuses on conducting an in-depth analysis of the current application status of various stem cells in major neurodegenerative and neuroimmune diseases including MS, AD, PD and ALS, kindling the hope for the development of stem cell-based cell therapies in neurological diseases.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.