SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

C/EBPβ as a master regulator of inflammasome signaling in neurodegenerative diseases: mechanisms and therapeutic implications.

Front Immunol · 2025-09-05

DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1656165PMID: 40977745

Open accessSystematic Review; review-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein beta (C/EBPβ), a key transcription factor, plays a central role in regulating inflammasome signaling in neurodegenerative diseases (NDs). This review synthesizes the mechanisms by which C/EBPβ modulates neuroinflammation and its potential as a therapeutic target. We conducted a comprehensive systematic review spanning January 1995 to June 2025, systematically querying Google Scholar and PubMed with the following keywords: neuroinflammation, inflammasome activation, C/EBPβ, therapeutic targeting, and neurodegenerative diseases. C/EBPβ exists in three isoforms-LAP1, LAP2, and LIP-each with distinct functions in inflammasome activation. In Alzheimer's disease (AD), C/EBPβ drives tau cleavage and Aβ pathology through the AEP axis and exacerbates neuroinflammation by upregulating APOE4. In Parkinson's disease (PD), C/EBPβ silencing reduces α-synuclein aggregation and dopaminergic neuron loss by suppressing the NLRP3 inflammasome. In Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), C/EBPβ is hypothesized to contribute to TDP-43-associated inflammasome activation, though this requires further validation. In Multiple Sclerosis (MS), C/EBPβ may influence microglial activation and neuroinflammation, as shown in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis models. Modulators of the C/EBPβ-inflammasome axis include endogenous regulators like gut-derived metabolites and pharmacological interventions such as small-molecule inhibitors. Therapeutic strategies targeting C/EBPβ hold promise for mitigating neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration, though challenges remain in achieving isoform-specific targeting and blood-brain barrier penetration. Future directions include CRISPR-based editing and biomarker development for personalized therapies.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.