SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety and depression symptoms in people of Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Front Aging Neurosci · 2025-09-05

DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2025.1440850PMID: 40979152

Open accessSystematic Review; systematic-review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

ObjectivesWe aim to conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of published RCTs (Randomized Controlled Trials, RCTs) to quantify the effects of CBT (Cognitive behavioral therapy, CBT), including both remote and in-person modalities, on anxiety, depressive symptoms, and QoL (Quality of Life, QoL) in people with PD (Parkinson's disease, PD).MethodsThe systematic review and meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Eight databases were systematically searched for existing RCTs of CBT in people of PD published in English or Chinese. Searches were updated to February 29, 2024. Methodological quality was appraised with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. A meta-analysis of comparative effects was performed using the Review Manager v. 5.4 software.Results16 RCTs were included in the study. The studies involved a total of 682 participants, the mean age of participants ranged from 43 to 85. Depression scores of people in the CBT intervention group were significantly improved (SMD: -1.01, 95CI [-1.27, -0.74], P P P = 0.08).ConclusionThis systematic review and meta-analysis provide evidence that CBT intervention significantly improved anxiety and depression in People of PD compared to the control group, whether through offline or remote intervention. No improvement effect of CBT intervention on the QoL of People of PD was found. In the future application of telemedicine, interdisciplinary interventions should be explored to improve the motor and non-motor symptoms and QoL of People of PD.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#recordDetails. Identifier: CRD42024526608.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.