SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Atypical Frontotemporal Dementia Associated With SQSTM1 Gene Mutation: A Clinicopathological Case.

Neuropathology · 2025-12-01

DOI: 10.1111/neup.70029PMID: 41077880

Open accesscase-study; Journal Article; Case ReportsOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

A 78-year-old man presented with a six-year history of progressive memory decline, initially manifesting as recent memory impairment and mild anomia, which gradually evolved into motor clumsiness, gait disturbances, language difficulties, behavioral changes, and late-onset parkinsonism. He had been diagnosed with Paget disease of bone (PDB) at the age of 45. Brain MRI revealed asymmetric left anterior temporal atrophy, while [18F]-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET demonstrated frontotemporal hypometabolism, predominantly on the left side, with marked involvement of both temporal poles and greater hypometabolism in the left temporal pole. A negative amyloid PET scan supported a diagnosis of frontotemporal dementia (FTD). Genetic analysis identified an SQSTM1 gene mutation (c.1210A>G; p.(Met404Val)). Post-mortem examination confirmed frontotemporal lobar degeneration with atypical TDP-43 protein distribution, alongside tau and Lewy body pathology. This case exemplifies an atypical presentation of FTD, characterized by amnestic onset with subsequent language and behavioral involvement, thereby broadening the recognized clinical spectrum of SQSTM1-associated FTD. The coexistence of parkinsonism and PDB, alongside mixed proteinopathies, underscores the phenotypic heterogeneity of SQSTM1 mutations. These findings emphasize the importance of considering prominent memory impairment, semantic deficits, and parkinsonism as potential manifestations in this genetic form and highlight the need for comprehensive clinical, genetic, and neuropathological evaluation to improve diagnosis and inform therapeutic strategies.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.